You are hereBlogs / H2otown's blog / Genocide survivor visits Council, witnesses council wrangle

Genocide survivor visits Council, witnesses council wrangle


By H2otown - Posted on 12 December 2007

Armenian genocide survivor visits town Council

Originally uploaded by lisa.williams.

Armenian genocide survivor Arika Derkazerian visited the Watertown Town Council on Tuesday to support Councillor Marilyn Devaney's proclamation urging the Massachusetts Municipal Association's continued co-sponsoring of the Anti Defamation League's No Place for Hate program.

Watertown severed its ties with the ADL's NPH program after TAB columnist John DiMascio brought to light the ADL's continuing denial of the Armenian genocide.

Mrs. Derkazerian's testimony was preceded by an embarrassing inside-baseball wrangle between At-Large Councillor Marilyn Devaney and the remainder of the council. The council wanted to bring the issue forward as a resolution, while Councillor Devaney brought the issue forward as a proclamation. Resolutions are not signed by individual councillors, while proclamations enable individual councillors to associate their name with a particular issue.

"On the way, I couldn't walk, they threw me on the side of the street, and I started crying, saying, why are you leaving me over here? Well, you can't walk, we can't carry you. If we went one way, we were afraid someone would kill us; so we had to go very quietly to Jerusalem...I don't remember it, I was only three, but I had older brothers who told me the story."

Before leaving, Ms. Derkazian said, "I'm here to support Marilyn."

"Arika has come out on a cold winter night to support me, and yet you're not allowing it, Father Barkmakian and all these people have come out to support it, they have read it and they support it, and now you're saying we're throwing out the rules and I can't do it...I'm asking you, Mr. President, follow the rules and let me do this."
Councillor Sideris said, "This was brought to the council at the last meeting at the last minute ---"

"I brought it to the Council President and he didn't put it on David Boyajian was with me when I wrote it!" exclaimed Councillor Devaney. "I'm not going to be called a liar!"

"We have one person speaking, so you have your seat over here, " said Council President Younger. "No, I'll stay here," said Devaney.
"Well, get away from the microphone," said Younger.

Councillor Sideris took the floor and said, "This was brought forward at the previous meeting and handed to the council at the last minute. It was brought forward as a proclamation. A proclamation, in the form usually used by the council, is used to congratulate a retiring employee, as we did today with Councillor Romanelli. The councillor claims that we need to follow the rules, but Council rule 9.2 states, and I'll read this for the record, all proclamations, ordinances, orders and resolution approved by the town council shall not have a reference to "sponsored by" or similar language identifying the councillor that brought it forward. "

"That was changed," Devaney said softly.

Sideris continued: "The bottom of the proclamation says, "Sponsored by Councillor Devaney." Over the last two weeks, I made the effort to draft a compromise resolution, which Councillor Hecht assisted me with. We felt a resolution would be more of a sense of the council and would be more appropriate to bring to the MMA. I gave a copy of this to the Council president for him to review it, and he put it on the agenda. So what we have before us tonight is a resolution, not a proclamation."

After Councillor Sideris read the resolution, Devaney said, "It looks like any reference to the ADL was taken out, and I think that's what it's all about. If we're going to talk about severing ties with the ADL, we have to talk about what the ADL is."

Ultimately, the council voted to adopt the resolution as written by Councillors Sideris and Hecht.

H2OTown writes:
"Watertown severed its ties with the ADL's NPH program after TAB columnist John DiMascio brought to light the ADL's continuing denial of the Armenian genocide."

Lisa, David Boyajian of Newtown is really the one who originally brought the situation to light and not I.

Respecting last night's meeting:

I watched from home in disbelief as MS. Devaney announced while still sitting down that she had 97-year old woman who wanted to speak on the matter. I said to myself surely even Marilyn would not stoop so low as to exploit a 97-year old genocide survivor to get "her proclamation" passed.

All I can say is kudos to Sideris for putting her in her place. Kudos to Younger, Romanelli, and others for doing the same.
This woman has been allowed to grandstand and abuse this issue for political gain since August. It’s about time someone put her in her place.

You’ll notice that she took her “pothole proclamation” off the table when she heard Younger say “this should be a resolution”. She’s was at least smart enough to know she was about to get clobbered again.

Well, okay, the proclamation got taken off the table, but now nobody's working on the pothole hotline.

After last night's meeting I'm totally confused. I realize this will involve some suspension of disbelief, but let's imagine we had a rational town council.

How would such a town council go about creating a pothole hotline?

Aren't BOTH resolutions and proclamations usually sidecars to the usual legislative process? Or are most acts of the council enacted via resolutions? As a hypothetical example, let's say that the Council uses some funds from the Town Council reserve to pay for expenses for Faire on the Square. After they vote on it, is the mechanism that they use to direct town employees to make it so a resolution? Or is the vote itself the direction?

...Unlike Paul Day, I kind of held my fire in this writeup. As I sat there watching it, I had one of those, "Am I nuts or is what I think I'm seeing really happening?" moments.

I'm glad I'm not the only one who thought that last night's Council meeting was pretty embarrassing. It really made me cringe to watch it.

Lisa,

Respecting if Watertown "had a rational town council".
This is one of those operational details, which does not require a vote of Council to establish.

The rational course of action would have been for the Councilor that had the idea to place a call to the Town Manager and ask him to have the DPW look into it.

If Devaney wanted to be formal about the thing. She should have held a DPW subcommittee meeting (which she Chairs) and asked Gerry Mee to attend. The subcommittee would then have brought a report and recommendation to the Council. At which point a simple motion (neither a proclamation or resolution) could have been made asking the Town Manager to look into implementing the measure.

The cost might be small enough to come out of the DPW's existing budget. But if it were not, the T.M. would ask for a transfer of funds from some other line item such as Council reserve.

Again that assumes that the administrative branch of the government actually agrees that there ought to be such a hotline.

This is one of those instances where the Council really doesn't need to micro-manage the town.

The idea is a good one. But we don't know the logistical complications, the cost benefit, etc, etc, etc. And it is certainly an abuse of a proclamation.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.



Recent comments

Syndicate content